From: David Heidelberg <[email protected]>
The lab and ibb regulators aren't used here. Disable them.
Removes following warnings:
qcom-lab-ibb-regulator c440000.spmi:pmic@3:labibb: Failed to create device link
(0x180) with supplier c440000.spmi for /soc@0/spmi@c440000/pmic@3/labibb/lab
qcom-lab-ibb-regulator c440000.spmi:pmic@3:labibb: Failed to create device link
(0x180) with supplier c440000.spmi for /soc@0/spmi@c440000/pmic@3/labibb/ibb
Fixes: 288ef8a42612 ("arm64: dts: sdm845: add oneplus6/6t devices")
Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <[email protected]>
---
I assume this is right approach, as OLEDs on both devices are driven by
different regulators.
Question is, if should be labibb nodes enabled by default?
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-common.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-common.dtsi
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-common.dtsi
index db6dd04c51bb5..78a835bdfe3b4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-common.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-oneplus-common.dtsi
@@ -419,6 +419,10 @@ rmi4_f12: rmi4-f12@12 {
};
};
+&ibb {
+ status = "disabled";
+};
+
&ipa {
qcom,gsi-loader = "self";
memory-region = <&ipa_fw_mem>;
@@ -426,6 +430,10 @@ &ipa {
status = "okay";
};
+&lab {
+ status = "disabled";
+};
+
&mdss {
status = "okay";
};
---
base-commit: 7d31f578f3230f3b7b33b0930b08f9afd8429817
change-id: 20251130-oneplus-labibb-05bdd6d6d2b1
Best regards,
--
David Heidelberg <[email protected]>
