On Mon, Feb 04 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 17:52:16 +0530 "Dragon kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > I am not able to boot 2.6.24-mm1 kernel on x86_64 machine with FC8. I > > am attaching config file and call trace also with this mail. > > > > > > [ 921.273592] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! [scsi_scan_0:473] > > [ 921.273601] CPU 0: > > [ 921.273601] Modules linked in: scsi_wait_scan tg3 shpchp > > pci_hotplug aacraid sd_mod scsi_mod ext3 jbd mbcache uhci_hcd ohci_hcd > > ssb ehci_hcd usbcore > > [ 921.273601] Pid: 473, comm: scsi_scan_0 Not tainted 2.6.24-mm1-autokern1 > > #1 > > [ 921.273601] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8031fa1b>] [<ffffffff8031fa1b>] > > radix_tree_gang_lookup+0xe1/0x139 > > [ 921.273601] RSP: 0018:ffff81007d99bda8 EFLAGS: 00000293 > > [ 921.273601] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff81007d99bde0 RCX: > > 0000000000000000 > > [ 921.273601] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff81007d8f2690 RDI: > > 000000000000000c > > [ 921.273601] RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: ffff81007d8dce0c R09: > > 0000000000000001 > > [ 921.273601] R10: ffff81007d90caf0 R11: 000000000000000d R12: > > ffff81000106ac00 > > [ 921.273601] R13: ffff8100808ed000 R14: ffff81007d99a000 R15: > > ffffffff8077eef0 > > [ 921.273601] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffffff8057e000(0000) > > knlGS:0000000000000000 > > [ 921.273601] CS: 0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b > > [ 921.273601] CR2: 00000000006167d0 CR3: 0000000000201000 CR4: > > 00000000000006e0 > > [ 921.273601] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: > > 0000000000000000 > > [ 921.273601] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: > > 0000000000000400 > > [ 921.273601] > > [ 921.273601] Call Trace: > > [ 921.273601] [<ffffffff8031870d>] ? call_for_each_cic+0x72/0x104 > > [ 921.273601] [<ffffffff80318e84>] ? cfq_exit_single_io_context+0x0/0x4e > > [ 921.273601] [<ffffffff803187b7>] ? cfq_exit_io_context+0x18/0x1a > > [ 921.273601] [<ffffffff80311844>] ? exit_io_context+0x101/0x111 > > [ 921.273601] [<ffffffff80239e53>] ? do_exit+0x794/0x7c1 > > [ 921.273601] [<ffffffff8020d03f>] ? child_rip+0x11/0x12 > > [ 921.273601] [<ffffffff8020c703>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30 > > [ 921.273601] [<ffffffff80249c5d>] ? kthreadd+0x17d/0x1a2 > > [ 921.273601] [<ffffffff80249da9>] ? kthread+0x0/0x77 > > [ 921.273601] [<ffffffff8020d02e>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x12 > > [ 921.273601] > > > > At a guess I'd say that call_for_each_cic() is failing to advance across > the radix-tree and got stuck.
I'd say that's a good guess, I don't see how else it could get stuck looping forever. > > Could you please apply this debug patch and retest? > > Thanks. > > diff -puN block/cfq-iosched.c~a block/cfq-iosched.c > --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c~a > +++ a/block/cfq-iosched.c > @@ -1159,6 +1159,7 @@ call_for_each_cic(struct io_context *ioc > > do { > int i; > + unsigned long next_index; > > /* > * Perhaps there's a better way - this just gang lookups from > @@ -1171,8 +1172,13 @@ call_for_each_cic(struct io_context *ioc > break; > > called += nr; > - index = 1 + (unsigned long) cics[nr - 1]->key; > - > + next_index = 1 + (unsigned long) cics[nr - 1]->key; > + if (next_index <= index) { > + printk("next_index=%lu, index=%lu\n", > + next_index, index); > + dump_stack(); > + } > + index = next_index; > for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) > func(ioc, cics[i]); > } while (nr == CIC_GANG_NR); > _ > -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/