On 2025-12-02 13:39:56 [+0100], Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 02.12.25 09:24, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > On 2025-12-01 22:51:50 [+0100], Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> How should we handle this? Consider 6.12 mainline with -rt and cgroups > >> as potentially broken, asking people to user 6.12-rt? Or port this back? > > > > If you have everything in v6.12 for an useable RT system and this is the > > only missing piece I could ask the stable nicely to backport this. > > > > Given that this is a fix for potential lock-up... Does it have > dependencies? The other two patches in this series are optimizations > only, or should they better join the backport?
Just an optimisation if I am not mistaken but it will conflict if not backported. > Jan Sebastian
