On Tue, Dec 2, 2025 at 7:31 AM Leon Hwang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> When updating an existing element in lru_hash maps, the current
> implementation always calls prealloc_lru_pop() to get a new node before
> checking if the key already exists. If the map is full, this triggers
> LRU eviction and removes an existing element, even though the update
> operation only needs to modify the value of an existing key in-place.
>
> This is problematic because:
> 1. Users may unexpectedly lose entries when doing simple value updates
> 2. The eviction overhead is unnecessary for existing key updates
>
> Fix this by first checking if the key exists before allocating a new
> node. If the key is found, update the value in-place, refresh the LRU
> reference, and return immediately without triggering any eviction.
>
> Fixes: 29ba732acbee ("bpf: Add BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_HASH")
> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <[email protected]>
> ---
>  kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> index c8a9b27f8663..fb624aa76573 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> @@ -1207,6 +1207,27 @@ static long htab_lru_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map 
> *map, void *key, void *value
>         b = __select_bucket(htab, hash);
>         head = &b->head;
>
> +       ret = htab_lock_bucket(b, &flags);
> +       if (ret)
> +               goto err_lock_bucket;
> +
> +       l_old = lookup_elem_raw(head, hash, key, key_size);
> +
> +       ret = check_flags(htab, l_old, map_flags);
> +       if (ret)
> +               goto err;
> +
> +       if (l_old) {
> +               bpf_lru_node_set_ref(&l_old->lru_node);
> +               copy_map_value(&htab->map, htab_elem_value(l_old, 
> map->key_size), value);
> +               check_and_free_fields(htab, l_old);
> +       }

We cannot do this. It breaks the atomicity of the update.
We added htab_map_update_elem_in_place() for a very specific case.
See
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
and discussion in v1,v2.

We cannot do in-place updates for other map types.
It will break user expectations.

pw-bot: cr

Reply via email to