> On Dec 13, 2025, at 10:56 PM, Zqiang <[email protected]> wrote: > > In some kernels which is set convert_to_big to SRCU_SIZING_INIT, > for use the init_srcu_struct*() to initialized srcu structure, > the is_static parameters is always false, the memory allocation > for srcu_sup structure's->node can use GFP_KERNEL flags. > > Signed-off-by: Zqiang <[email protected]> > --- > kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c > index ea3f128de06f..e4571b569752 100644 > --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c > +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c > @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ static int init_srcu_struct_fields(struct srcu_struct > *ssp, bool is_static) > ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp = SRCU_GP_SEQ_INITIAL_VAL; > ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_last_gp_end = ktime_get_mono_fast_ns(); > if (READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_size_state) == SRCU_SIZE_SMALL && > SRCU_SIZING_IS_INIT()) { > - if (!init_srcu_struct_nodes(ssp, GFP_ATOMIC)) > + if (!init_srcu_struct_nodes(ssp, !is_static ? GFP_KERNEL : > GFP_ATOMIC))
Nit: please avoid double negatives, becomes a bit harder to read: Instead, is_static ? GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_KERNEL Is it also worthwhile adding a might_sleep() here for additional robustness? Thanks. > goto err_free_sda; > WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_sup->srcu_size_state, SRCU_SIZE_BIG); > } > -- > 2.48.1 > >
