On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 09:29:29PM +0000, David Matlack wrote: > On 2026-01-08 02:33 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 10:24:19AM -0800, David Matlack wrote: > > > > > Oh, I was thinking about a compatability only flow only in the type 1 > > > > > emulation that internally magically converts a VMA to a dmabuf, but I > > > > > haven't written anything.. It is a bit tricky and the type 1 emulation > > > > > has not been as popular as I expected?? > > > > > > > > In part because of this gap, I'd guess. Thanks, > > > > > > Lack of huge mappings in the IOMMU when using VFIO_TYPE1_IOMMU is > > > another gap I'm aware of. > > > vfio_dma_mapping_test.vfio_type1_iommu_anonymous_hugetlb_1gb.dma_map_unmap > > > fails when IOMMUFD_VFIO_CONTAINER is enabled. > > > > What is this? I'm not aware of it.. > > It's one of the test cases within > tools/testing/selftests/vfio/vfio_dma_mapping_test.c. > > Here's the output when running with CONFIG_IOMMUFD_VFIO_CONTAINER=y: > > # RUN > vfio_dma_mapping_test.vfio_type1_iommu_anonymous_hugetlb_1gb.dma_map_unmap ... > Mapped HVA 0x7f0480000000 (size 0x40000000) at IOVA 0x0 > Searching for IOVA 0x0 in > /sys/kernel/debug/iommu/intel/0000:6a:01.0/domain_translation_struct > Found IOMMU mappings for IOVA 0x0: > PGD: 0x0000000203475027 > P4D: 0x0000000203476027 > PUD: 0x0000000203477027 > PMD: 0x00000001e7562027 > PTE: 0x00000041c0000067 > # > tools/testing/selftests/vfio/vfio_dma_mapping_test.c:188:dma_map_unmap:Expected > 0 (0) == mapping.pte (282394099815) > # dma_map_unmap: Test terminated by assertion > # FAIL > vfio_dma_mapping_test.vfio_type1_iommu_anonymous_hugetlb_1gb.dma_map_unmap
I can't think of any reason this would fail, I think your tests have found a real bug?? Can you check into it, what kernel call fails and where does the kernel code come from? I don't think I can run these tests with the HW I have?? Jason
