On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 22:53:10 -0800
Zachary Amsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 13:44 +0700, Igor M Podlesny wrote:
> > On 2008-02-05 13:34, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > [...]
> > >>  1) To have compiled it I had to replace
> > >> global_flush_tlb() call with __flush_tlb_all() and still
> > >> guessing was it(?) a correct replacment at all :-)
> > > 
> > > it is not; 
> > 
> >     I see, thanks. What would be the correct one? ;-)
> 
> global_flush_tlb() would be the correct one.

... except that that function got absorbed into the functions that would 
otherwise require this guy to be called
(which is a needed step to do more selective clflushes for the specific range 
rather than wholesale wbinvd's
that flush all 12Mb or your cache while you only need to flush 4Kb... but only 
the other function knew the exact
range of stuff to flush)

> 


-- 
If you want to reach me at my work email, use [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to