On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 8:07 PM Leon Hwang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 23/1/26 11:55, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 7:25 PM Leon Hwang <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> +static int probe_bpf_syscall_common_attrs(int token_fd)
> >> +{
> >> +       int ret;
> >> +
> >> +       ret = probe_sys_bpf_ext();
> >> +       return ret > 0;
> >> +}
> >
> > When you look at the above, what thoughts come to mind?
> >
> > ... and please don't use ai for answers.
>
> My initial thought was whether probe_fd() is needed here to handle and
> close a returned fd, since the return value of probe_sys_bpf_ext() isn’t
> obvious from the call site.

Fair enough, but then collapse it into one helper if FD is a concern.
My question was about stylistic/taste preferences.

Reply via email to