On 1/28/26 1:26 PM, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Add support for the pin controller block on SM6350 Low Power Island.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <[email protected]>
> ---
[...]
> +static const struct lpi_pingroup sm6350_groups[] = {
> + LPI_PINGROUP(0, 0, swr_tx_clk, qua_mi2s_sclk, _, _),
> + LPI_PINGROUP(1, 2, swr_tx_data, qua_mi2s_ws, _, _),
> + LPI_PINGROUP(2, 4, swr_tx_data, qua_mi2s_data, _, _),
> + LPI_PINGROUP(3, 8, swr_rx_clk, qua_mi2s_data, _, _),
> + LPI_PINGROUP(4, 10, swr_rx_data, qua_mi2s_data, _, _),
> + LPI_PINGROUP(5, 12, swr_rx_data, _, qua_mi2s_data, _),
> + LPI_PINGROUP(6, LPI_NO_SLEW, dmic1_clk, i2s1_clk, _, _),
> + LPI_PINGROUP(7, LPI_NO_SLEW, dmic1_data, i2s1_ws, _, _),
> + LPI_PINGROUP(8, LPI_NO_SLEW, dmic2_clk, i2s1_data, _, _),
> + LPI_PINGROUP(9, LPI_NO_SLEW, dmic2_data, i2s1_data, _, _),
> + LPI_PINGROUP(10, 16, i2s2_clk, wsa_swr_clk, _, _),
> + LPI_PINGROUP(11, 18, i2s2_ws, wsa_swr_data, _, _),
> + LPI_PINGROUP(12, LPI_NO_SLEW, dmic3_clk, i2s2_data, _, _),
> + LPI_PINGROUP(13, LPI_NO_SLEW, dmic3_data, i2s2_data, _, _),
> + LPI_PINGROUP_SLEW_SPARE_1(14, 0, swr_tx_data, _, _, _),
Modulo this odd cookie, it's identical to 8250.. but then it messes with
all the definitions, so it makes sense to keep it separate
I verified all the functions and slew offsets
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]>
Konrad
