On 1/28/26 7:35 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
> 
> 
> On 1/28/26 10:26 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
>>> index 5a075e06cf..070ba80e39 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
>>> @@ -4112,3 +4112,8 @@ bool bpf_jit_supports_timed_may_goto(void)
>>>  {
>>>     return true;
>>>  }
>>> +
>>> +bool bpf_jit_supports_fsession(void)
>>        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> This is the actual function name in the code.
> 
> Ihor, I think the script parsing review-inline.txt chopped off the
> part of the review where AI was complaining about the commit message?

This is the email body pre-processing in KPD, yes.

At some point we decided to remove the commit message before sending
an email, but now that AI reviews the messages too, I think we should
just send the generated review-inline.txt as is.

Alexei, wdyt?

> 
> [...]
> 


Reply via email to