On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 1:57 AM Alexei Starovoitov
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2026 at 1:01 AM Chengkaitao <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > From: Chengkaitao <[email protected]>
> >
> > For the following scenario:
> > struct tree_node {
> >     struct bpf_rb_node node;
> >     struct request __kptr *req;
> >     u64 key;
> > };
> > struct bpf_rb_root tree_root __contains(tree_node, node);
> > struct bpf_spin_lock tree_lock;
> >
> > If we need to traverse all nodes in the rbtree, retrieve the __kptr
> > pointer from each node, and read kernel data from the referenced
> > object, using bpf_kptr_xchg appears unavoidable.
> >
> > This patch skips the BPF verifier checks for bpf_kptr_xchg when
> > called while holding a lock.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chengkaitao <[email protected]>
>
> You ignored earlier feedback. This is not ok.
>
It's my full name. Every region has its own customs and traditions,
so this isn't an essential change.

-- 
Yours,
Chengkaitao

Reply via email to