It's harmless even if: chrdev_open() and cdev_device_del() run at the
same time, and gpio_chrdev_open() gets called after the underlying GPIO
chip has gone.  The subsequent file operations check the availability
of struct gpio_chip anyway.

Don't check struct gpio_chip in gpio_chrdev_open().

Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <[email protected]>
---
v2:
- No changes.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]

 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
index b89201578516..aaa5de814468 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
@@ -2689,12 +2689,6 @@ static int gpio_chrdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct 
file *file)
        struct gpio_chardev_data *cdev;
        int ret = -ENOMEM;
 
-       guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu);
-
-       /* Fail on open if the backing gpiochip is gone */
-       if (!rcu_access_pointer(gdev->chip))
-               return -ENODEV;
-
        cdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*cdev), GFP_KERNEL);
        if (!cdev)
                return -ENOMEM;
-- 
2.53.0.rc2.204.g2597b5adb4-goog


Reply via email to