On Sun, Feb 8, 2026 at 11:46 PM Sandipan Das <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 2/7/2026 6:53 AM, Jim Mattson wrote:
> > Update amd_pmu_set_eventsel_hw() to clear the event selector's hardware
> > enable bit when the PMC should not count based on the guest's Host-Only and
> > Guest-Only event selector bits and the current vCPU state.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jim Mattson <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h |  2 ++
> >  arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c            | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h 
> > b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
> > index 0d9af4135e0a..4dfe12053c09 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
> > @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@
> >  #define AMD64_EVENTSEL_INT_CORE_ENABLE                       (1ULL << 36)
> >  #define AMD64_EVENTSEL_GUESTONLY                     (1ULL << 40)
> >  #define AMD64_EVENTSEL_HOSTONLY                              (1ULL << 41)
> > +#define AMD64_EVENTSEL_HOST_GUEST_MASK                       \
> > +     (AMD64_EVENTSEL_HOSTONLY | AMD64_EVENTSEL_GUESTONLY)
> >
> >  #define AMD64_EVENTSEL_INT_CORE_SEL_SHIFT            37
> >  #define AMD64_EVENTSEL_INT_CORE_SEL_MASK             \
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
> > index d9ca633f9f49..8d451110a94d 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/pmu.c
> > @@ -149,8 +149,26 @@ static int amd_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, 
> > struct msr_data *msr_info)
> >
> >  static void amd_pmu_set_eventsel_hw(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> >  {
> > +     struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = pmc->vcpu;
> > +     u64 host_guest_bits;
> > +
> >       pmc->eventsel_hw = (pmc->eventsel & ~AMD64_EVENTSEL_HOSTONLY) |
> >                          AMD64_EVENTSEL_GUESTONLY;
> > +
> > +     if (!(pmc->eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE))
> > +             return;
> > +
> > +     if (!(vcpu->arch.efer & EFER_SVME))
> > +             return;
> > +
> > +     host_guest_bits = pmc->eventsel & AMD64_EVENTSEL_HOST_GUEST_MASK;
> > +     if (!host_guest_bits || host_guest_bits == 
> > AMD64_EVENTSEL_HOST_GUEST_MASK)
> > +             return;
> > +
> > +     if (!!(host_guest_bits & AMD64_EVENTSEL_GUESTONLY) == 
> > is_guest_mode(vcpu))
> > +             return;
>
> This seems to disable the PMCs after exits from an L2 guest to the L0 
> hypervisor.
> For such transitions, the corresponding L1 vCPU's PMC has GuestOnly set but
> is_guest_mode() is false as this function is called at the very end of
> leave_guest_mode() after vcpu->stat.guest_mode is set to 0.
>
> Is this a correct interpretation of the condition above?

I think you are confusing the VMCB02 bits (that always have Guest-Only
set) and the VMCB12 bits (which are under the control of L1.

If L1 sets only Guest-Only, that indicates a desire to monitor only L2
execution. So, yes, after emulating an exit from L2 to L1, the PMC is
disabled.

> > +
> > +     pmc->eventsel_hw &= ~ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE;
> >  }
> >
> >  static int amd_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data 
> > *msr_info)
>

Reply via email to