On Tue Nov 18, 2025 at 12:50 PM CET, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 11/18/25 12:08 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: >> On 18/11/2025 10:06, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >>>>> Konrad >>>> vfe170 is what we have on sdm845 >>>> >>>> So I'm just asking Luca to try the sdm845 method of waggling this clock >>>> since what we have doesn't work. >>> It's of course going to work because this way you're not calling the >>> code that throws this error >>> >>> I was curious whether you know the actual reason why this is being >>> done in some other GCC drivers >>> >>> Konrad >> >> No notion at all, perhaps as a workaround to this very problem. > > I tried digging it up, but only managed to find that there is a signal > between titan and gcc to request it being enabled (perhaps that's a > fancy description of hwcg) > > Maybe +Taniya would know? (context: sm6350 gcc_camera_axi_clk stuck at > 'on' when disabling)
Coming back on this again, anybody got an idea about this clock issue? Regards Luca > > Konrad
