On 13/02/2026 09:29, Erikas Bitovtas wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Erikas Bitovtas <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> .../devicetree/bindings/iio/light/vishay,vcnl4000.yaml | 17 >>> +++++++++++------ >>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git >>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/light/vishay,vcnl4000.yaml >>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/light/vishay,vcnl4000.yaml >>> index 4d1a225e8868..2ba4d5de4ec4 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/light/vishay,vcnl4000.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/light/vishay,vcnl4000.yaml >>> @@ -18,12 +18,17 @@ allOf: >>> >>> properties: >>> compatible: >>> - enum: >>> - - vishay,vcnl4000 >>> - - vishay,vcnl4010 >>> - - vishay,vcnl4020 >>> - - vishay,vcnl4040 >>> - - vishay,vcnl4200 >>> + oneOf: >>> + - enum: >>> + - capella,cm36672p >> >> CM36672P is compatible with CM36686, but this is not expressed. >> Confusing commit msg and code. > > For CM36672P we create a dedicated compatible because it is a > proximity-only sensor which has the same proximity sensor configuration, > but ambient light sensor registers are missing (reserved).
I don't understand this. You just wrote "fully compatible with CM36686" and now you imply that not. Decide. Best regards, Krzysztof
