On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 02:15:01PM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote:
> +  power-domains:
> +    maxItems: 6
> +
> +  power-domain-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: bps
> +      - const: ife0
> +      - const: ife1

ife0, ife1, ife2, top, bps, ipe like in sm6150 or sm8650.

> +      - const: ife2
> +      - const: ipe
> +      - const: top
> +
> +  vdd-csiphy0-0p9-supply:
> +    description:
> +      Phandle to a 0.9V regulator supply to CSIPHY0.
> +
> +  vdd-csiphy0-1p25-supply:
> +    description:
> +      Phandle to a 1.25V regulator supply to CSIPHY0.
> +
> +  vdd-csiphy1-0p9-supply:
> +    description:
> +      Phandle to a 0.9V regulator supply to CSIPHY1.
> +
> +  vdd-csiphy1-1p25-supply:
> +    description:
> +      Phandle to a 1.25V regulator supply to CSIPHY1.
> +
> +  vdd-csiphy2-0p9-supply:
> +    description:
> +      Phandle to a 0.9V regulator supply to CSIPHY2.
> +
> +  vdd-csiphy2-1p25-supply:
> +    description:
> +      Phandle to a 1.25V regulator supply to CSIPHY2.
> +
> +  vdd-csiphy3-0p9-supply:
> +    description:
> +      Phandle to a 0.9V regulator supply to CSIPHY3.
> +
> +  vdd-csiphy3-1p25-supply:
> +    description:
> +      Phandle to a 1.25V regulator supply to CSIPHY3.

I assume that we abandon the idea of separate CSI PHY devices. It was
discssed way too long time ago.

With domains changed:

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Reply via email to