[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rogier Wolff) writes: > If the firewall operator is sufficiently paranoid, they can say: "We > don't trust the ECN implementation on our hosts behind the firewall, > so we want to disable it.". In which case would the "correct" action not be to zero the ECN bits of packets passing through the firewall? This would have the effect of informing the ECN aware hosts (both within and outside the firewall) that ECN is not available for that connection. This would not prevent ECN aware systems from connecting. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) jamal
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Gregory Maxwell
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) David Lang
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) David S. Miller
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Gregory Maxwell
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Jamie Lokier
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Alan Cox
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Michael H. Warfield
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Peter Samuelson
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Rogier Wolff
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Graham Murray
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) jamal
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Rogier Wolff
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Gregory Maxwell
- ECN fixes for Cisco gear Dax Kelson
- Re: ECN fixes for Cisco gear Lincoln Dale
- ECN connectivity surveys Dax Kelson
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Ben Ford
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) James Sutherland
- Re: ECN: Clearing the air (fwd) Ben Ford