Jani Nikula <[email protected]> writes: > So yeah, there are definitely tradeoffs there. But it's not like this > constant patching of kernel-doc is exactly burden free either. I don't > know, is it just me, but I'd like to think as a profession we'd be past > writing ad hoc C parsers by now.
I don't think that having a "real" parser is going to free us from the need to patch kernel-doc. The kernel uses a weird form of C, and kernel-doc is expected to evolve as our dialect of the language does. It *might* make that patching job easier -- that is to be seen -- but it won't make it go away. Thanks, jon
