On Tue, 10 Mar 2026, Nicolas Palix wrote:
> Hi, > > Maybe we can just throw away that section of "Supplemental documentation" and > its link ? > > Nowadays, there is much more SmPL provided, and the rst file > describes better and up-to-date information. > > Would a link to > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/coccinelle.html > be useful to point to latest version ? OK, thanks. There is also an out of date URL in that page. I will send a patch. julia > > Sincerely, > > Le 09/03/2026 à 17:28, Haoyang Liu a écrit : > > > > On 3/10/2026 12:10 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > > LIU Haoyang <[email protected]> writes: > > > > > > > The original supplemental documentation for coccicheck is > > > > https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck, which redirects to a not > > > > found page, > > > > thus change it to https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck.html, > > > > which adds a suffix to original URL to make it direct to the right page. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: LIU Haoyang <[email protected]> > > > > --- > > > > Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst | 2 +- > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst b/Documentation/ > > > > dev-tools/coccinelle.rst > > > > index 2b942e3c8049..f73ccf5397f3 100644 > > > > --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst > > > > +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst > > > > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ Supplemental documentation > > > > For supplemental documentation refer to the wiki: > > > > -https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck > > > > +https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck.html > > > > The wiki documentation always refers to the linux-next version of the > > > > script. > > > I'll apply this - a working URL is better than a broken one. But is > > > there really nothing better to link to than a page that warns "OBSOLETE > > > CONTENT" at the top? > > > > Dear Jon, > > > > Unfortunately, I do not find any other documents about this script, so I > > have to use it even though it's obsolete. > > > > Sincerely, > > Haoyang > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > jon > > > > > > > > > >
