On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:38:17 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all, > > Can we be a bit more careful with the ordering of commits, please? > Commit d22a6966b8029913fac37d078ab2403898d94c63 (iommu sg merging: add > accessors for segment_boundary_mask in device_dma_parameters()) > introduces the dma_get_seg_boundary accessor which is used in the > *preceding* commits fb3475e9b6bfa666107512fbd6006c26014f04b8 (for > powerpc), and 1b39b077789955c8389488d53d075518fdcd582e and > fde9a1094ddf2892188a8a0eccda527de47cba8e (for x86). > > Thus we have another set of commits that will break bisection. This one > was easily avoidable. > > A little more care is needed. Sorry about it. I submitted the patches in the proper order but the order seemed to be reversed in the -mm. http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg11919.html I could have noticed the issue since it has been in the -mm for a long time, sorry. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
