Please don't forget to CC me on the next version.

On 3/23/26 00:39, Aleksei Oladko wrote:
> test_shadow_stack prints a message indicating that the test is
> skipped in some cases, but still returns 1. This causes the test
> to be reported as failed instead of skipped.
> 
> Return KSFT_SKIP in the skip path so the result is reported
> correctly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aleksei Oladko <[email protected]>
> 
> ---
> v2:
> - return SKIP only for "Could not enable Shadow stack" case
> - Changed message from SKIP to FAIL for remaining cases
> ---
>  .../testing/selftests/x86/test_shadow_stack.c | 20 +++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_shadow_stack.c 
> b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_shadow_stack.c
> index 21af54d5f4ea..4c5437846d26 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_shadow_stack.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_shadow_stack.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
>  #include <sys/signal.h>
>  #include <linux/elf.h>
>  #include <linux/perf_event.h>
> +#include "kselftest.h"
>  
>  /*
>   * Define the ABI defines if needed, so people can run the tests
> @@ -64,7 +65,7 @@
>  int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>  {
>       printf("[SKIP]\tCompiler does not support CET.\n");
> -     return 0;
> +     return KSFT_SKIP;
>  }
>  #else
>  void write_shstk(unsigned long *addr, unsigned long val)
> @@ -496,7 +497,7 @@ int test_userfaultfd(void)
>       uffd = syscall(__NR_userfaultfd, O_CLOEXEC | O_NONBLOCK);
>       if (uffd < 0) {
>               printf("[SKIP]\tUserfaultfd unavailable.\n");
> -             return 0;
> +             return KSFT_SKIP;

This is incorrect and will lead to fail instead of skip.

>       }
>  
>       reset_test_shstk(0);
> @@ -820,9 +821,11 @@ static int test_uretprobe(void)
>  
>       type = determine_uprobe_perf_type();
>       if (type < 0) {
> -             if (type == -ENOENT)
> +             if (type == -ENOENT) {
>                       printf("[SKIP]\tUretprobe test, uprobes are not 
> available\n");
> -             return 0;
> +                     return KSFT_SKIP;

same here.

Can you please stick to 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ 
more closely.

> +             }
> +             return 1;
>       }
>  
>       offset = get_uprobe_offset(uretprobe_trigger);
> @@ -981,21 +984,21 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>  
>       if (ARCH_PRCTL(ARCH_SHSTK_ENABLE, ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK)) {
>               printf("[SKIP]\tCould not enable Shadow stack\n");
> -             return 1;
> +             return KSFT_SKIP;
>       }
>  
>       if (ARCH_PRCTL(ARCH_SHSTK_DISABLE, ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK)) {
> -             ret = 1;
>               printf("[FAIL]\tDisabling shadow stack failed\n");
> +             return 1;
>       }
>  
>       if (ARCH_PRCTL(ARCH_SHSTK_ENABLE, ARCH_SHSTK_SHSTK)) {
> -             printf("[SKIP]\tCould not re-enable Shadow stack\n");
> +             printf("[FAIL]\tCould not re-enable Shadow stack\n");
>               return 1;
>       }
>  
>       if (ARCH_PRCTL(ARCH_SHSTK_ENABLE, ARCH_SHSTK_WRSS)) {
> -             printf("[SKIP]\tCould not enable WRSS\n");
> +             printf("[FAIL]\tCould not enable WRSS\n");
>               ret = 1;
>               goto out;
>       }
> @@ -1057,6 +1060,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>       if (test_ptrace()) {
>               ret = 1;
>               printf("[FAIL]\tptrace test\n");
> +             goto out;
>       }
>  
>       if (test_32bit()) {

-- 
Best regards, Pavel Tikhomirov
Senior Software Developer, Virtuozzo.


Reply via email to