From: Cosmin Ratiu <[email protected]>
In commit [1] a comment about nested instance locking was updated. But
there's another place where this is mentioned, so update that as well.
[1] commit 0061b5199d7c ("devlink: Reverse locking order for nested
instances")
Signed-off-by: Cosmin Ratiu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Carolina Jubran <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/networking/devlink/index.rst | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/devlink/index.rst
b/Documentation/networking/devlink/index.rst
index f7ba7dcf477d..2087c2de5104 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/devlink/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/networking/devlink/index.rst
@@ -31,8 +31,8 @@ sure to respect following rules:
- Lock ordering should be maintained. If driver needs to take instance
lock of both nested and parent instances at the same time, devlink
- instance lock of the parent instance should be taken first, only then
- instance lock of the nested instance could be taken.
+ instance lock of the nested instance should be taken first, only then
+ instance lock of the parent instance could be taken.
- Driver should use object-specific helpers to setup the
nested relationship:
--
2.44.0
