Hans-Jürgen Koch wrote: > If somebody prefers an other OS for license reasons only, let them. You > cannot have open source software without open source license. If a > company chooses Linux, they do it for technical reasons, and because > they're able to modify the sources to suit their needs. Whatever > advantages they see in Linux, they have to know that they have to > accept its license. Just saying "I like your software but > your license is stupid" is childish. Use CE instead.
Nobody is saying "I don't like your licence." The issue is a technical restriction in Linux that attempts to restrict non-GPL software from running under it. It's a bullish approach, technically incompetent, legally meaningless and politically damaging. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/