On Sat, Apr 04, 2026 at 03:26:32AM +0000, Antony Kurniawan Soemardi wrote: > On 4/4/2026 4:54 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > Does it also prevent users from spamming the dmesg? > > It should be for no such channel case. The only remaining error logs > from pm8xxx_read_raw are timeout errors, which I don’t think would > result in immediate spamming. Or should we remove the dev_err (at > pm8xxx_read_channel_rsv) on timeout errors too?
Does the user get -ETIMEDOUT? If so, yes, message may be removed. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
