On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:20:38 +0100 Frank Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Wouldn't it be prudent to have a check that this is indeed a R5C832, > > and a failure mode if it's none of the two known devices? > > Also thought about that, but as far as i can see this cannot happen since > we only probe for those two devices and deny to continue if anything else > /those two were not found in the beginning. > Can never be too careful though. :) I've applied the patch for now. Feel free to keep digging and finding some docs for those regs though. Rgds Pierre
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature