On Wed, Apr 8, 2026 at 6:21 AM Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 02:21:07PM +0800, Menglong Dong wrote: > > The fsession attach type is missed in the verifier log in > > check_get_func_ip(), bpf_check_attach_target() and check_attach_btf_id(). > > Update them to make the verifier log proper. Meanwhile, update the > > corresponding selftests. > > > > Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <[email protected]> > > Acked-by: Leon Hwang <[email protected]> > > --- > > v2: > > - add a missing FSESSION in bpf_check_attach_target() > > --- > > kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 10 +++++----- > > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/exceptions.c | 8 ++++---- > > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/sleepable.c | 2 +- > > 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c > > index 594260c1f382..beb660b4c3ec 100644 > > --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c > > +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c > > @@ -11757,7 +11757,7 @@ static int check_get_func_ip(struct > > bpf_verifier_env *env) > > > > if (type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING) { > > if (!bpf_prog_has_trampoline(env->prog)) { > > - verbose(env, "func %s#%d supported only for > > fentry/fexit/fmod_ret programs\n", > > + verbose(env, "func %s#%d supported only for > > fentry/fexit/fsession/fmod_ret programs\n", > > func_id_name(func_id), func_id); > > return -ENOTSUPP; > > } > > @@ -25561,7 +25561,7 @@ int bpf_check_attach_target(struct bpf_verifier_log > > *log, > > btf = tgt_prog ? tgt_prog->aux->btf : prog->aux->attach_btf; > > if (!btf) { > > bpf_log(log, > > - "FENTRY/FEXIT program can only be attached to another > > program annotated with BTF\n"); > > + "FENTRY/FEXIT/FSESSION program can only be attached > > to another program annotated with BTF\n"); > > I wonder this should say 'Tracing program...' instead, > we have other tracing types not covered in this error
+1 pw-bot: cr
