On Thu, Apr 09, 2026 at 03:08:45PM +0200, Vasily Gorbik wrote:
> Commit 61bbcfb50514 ("srcu: Push srcu_node allocation to GP when
> non-preemptible") defers srcu_node tree allocation when called under
> raw spinlock, putting SRCU through ~6 transitional grace periods
> (SRCU_SIZE_ALLOC to SRCU_SIZE_BIG). During this transition srcu_gp_end()
> uses mask = ~0, which makes srcu_schedule_cbs_snp() call queue_work_on()
> for every possible CPU. Since rcu_gp_wq is WQ_PERCPU, work targets
> per-CPU pools directly - pools for not-online CPUs have no workers,[Cc workqueue] Hmm.. I thought for offline CPUs the corresponding worker pools become a unbound one hence there are still workers? Regards, Boqun > work accumulates, workqueue lockup detector fires. > > Before 61bbcfb50514, GFP_ATOMIC allocation went straight to > SRCU_SIZE_BIG, the mask = ~0 path was never reached. > > Affects systems with convert_to_big active (auto when nr_cpu_ids >= 128) > and possible CPUs > online CPUs. Hit on s390 LPAR (76 online, 400 possible), > where possible CPUs > online CPUs is the usual case. > Also reproducible on x86 KVM --smp 16,maxcpus=255 (CONFIG_NR_CPUS=256) > or simply -smp 1,maxcpus=2 with srcutree.convert_to_big=1 > or --smp 16,maxcpus=64 with srcutree.big_cpu_lim=32 (CONFIG_NR_CPUS=64) > > s390 log (76 online CPUs, 400 possible, all pools 76-399 stuck): > > BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=76 node=0 flags=0x4 nice=0 stuck for > 1842s! > BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=77 node=0 flags=0x4 nice=0 stuck for > 1842s! > ... > BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=399 node=0 flags=0x4 nice=0 stuck for > 1842s! > Showing busy workqueues and worker pools: > workqueue rcu_gp: flags=0x108 > pwq 306: cpus=76 node=0 flags=0x4 nice=0 active=3 refcnt=4 > pending: 3*srcu_invoke_callbacks > pwq 310: cpus=77 node=0 flags=0x4 nice=0 active=3 refcnt=4 > pending: 3*srcu_invoke_callbacks > ... > pwq 1598: cpus=399 node=0 flags=0x4 nice=0 active=3 refcnt=4 > pending: 3*srcu_invoke_callbacks > > Not sure if replacing mask = ~0 with something derived from > cpu_online_mask would be racy in that context. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/[email protected] > [2] > https://lore.kernel.org/rcu/fe28d664-3872-40f6-83c6-818627ad5b7d@paulmck-laptop
