On 3/20/26 00:30, Lisa Wang wrote: > Here's a second revision to fix MF_DELAYED handling on memory failure. > > This patch series addresses an issue in the memory failure handling path > where MF_DELAYED is incorrectly treated as an error. This issue was > discovered while testing memory failure handling for guest_memfd. > > The proposed solution involves - > 1. Clarifying the definition of MF_DELAYED to mean that memory failure > handling is only partially completed, and that the metadata for the > memory that failed (as in struct page/folio) is still referenced. > 2. Updating shmem’s handling to align with the clarified definition. > 3. Updating how the result of .error_remove_folio() is interpreted. > > RFC v2 is a more complete solution that includes parts 1 and 2 above to > address David’s comment [1]. Selftests are included for all the above.
Skimmed over 2 -> 4 and they LGTM. -- Cheers, David
