On Thu, 16 Apr 2026 at 16:35, Neal Gompa <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 6:21 AM Daniel Vacek <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Apr 2026 at 07:30, Neal Gompa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 28, 2026 at 2:57 AM Daniel Vacek <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 27 Feb 2026 at 23:26, Neal Gompa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 10:55 AM Daniel Vacek <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 21 Feb 2026 at 21:56, Eric Biggers <[email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 07:22:32PM +0100, Daniel Vacek wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > These are the remaining parts from former series [1] from Omar, > > > > > > > > Sweet Tea > > > > > > > > and Josef. Some bits of it were split into the separate set > > > > > > > > [2] before. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Notably, at this stage encryption is not supported with RAID5/6 > > > > > > > > setup > > > > > > > > and send is also isabled for now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Where does this series apply to? There's no base-commit or git > > > > > > > tree, > > > > > > > and it doesn't apply to mainline or btrfs/for-next. > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Eric, > > > > > > > > > > > > My apologies, I did not explicitly mention the base. I'll do it > > > > > > next time. > > > > > > This was based on for-next @20260127 (commit 80dbfe6512d9c). > > > > > > Since then, some changes occurred that will require additional > > > > > > touches. No wonder it does not apply anymore. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When you make your next revision, can you also provide a tag or branch > > > > > that I can use to grab the patches for testing? It would be easier for > > > > > me than trying to yoink them down from the emails with how many of > > > > > them there are... > > > > > > > > Sure > > > > > > > > > > Ping to ask about the refreshed patch set. With 7.0 out the door, it'd > > > be nice to have an updated set with feedback addressed... > > > > Hi Neal, > > > > I wanted to post a new iteration last week but I hit some new issues > > that I'm trying to address now. > > The WIP is here if you want to have a peek: > > > > https://github.com/dvacek/linux-btrfs/tree/fscrypt > > > > Note, I'll be force-updating it later so don't take even the v7 tag > > for granted at this point. > > > > Cool. I've got some travel and stuff going on, so I'll probably only > get to take another crack at this in a couple of weeks. Do you think > by then you'll have a finalized v7?
Yeah, it's on track. I expect to have it ready in 1-2 weeks (famous last words). --nX > -- > 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
