Manuel Ebner <[email protected]> writes: >> So you have not gone with the "implicit GFP_KERNEL" approach that Linus >> added. Given that, I assume, he wanted that to be the normal style, we >> should probably go with it. > > I scanned those 8 replies by Linus, but i can't figure out what you mean with > implicit GFP_Kernel approach, can you give me a hint? > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=slab%3A+Introduce+kmalloc_obj%28%29+and+family+f%3Atorvalds
See https://lwn.net/Articles/1062856/ jon
