On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 03:09:53PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
> email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
> 
> For local reproduction steps see 
> https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-local.html
> ---
> net: mana: Guard mana_remove against double invocation
> 
> If PM resume fails (e.g., mana_attach() returns an error), mana_probe()
> calls mana_remove(), which tears down the device and sets
> gd->gdma_context = NULL and gd->driver_data = NULL. However, a failed
> resume callback does not automatically unbind the driver. When the device
> is eventually unbound, mana_remove() is invoked a second time. Without a
> NULL check, it dereferences gc->dev with gc == NULL, causing a kernel
> panic. Add an early return if gdma_context or driver_data is NULL so the
> second invocation is harmless.
> 
> > Fixes: ca9c54d2d6a5 ("net: mana: Add a driver for Microsoft Azure Network 
> > Adapter (MANA)")
> 
> The Fixes: tag points to ca9c54d2d6a5, which introduced mana_remove()
> without NULL checks. However, the exploitable double invocation scenario
> was actually introduced by commit 635096a86edb ("net: mana: Support
> hibernation and kexec"), which added suspend/resume support and made
> mana_probe() call mana_remove() on error.
> 
> Should the Fixes: tag be:
> 
> Fixes: 635096a86edb ("net: mana: Support hibernation and kexec")
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c 
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
> > index 9d095a6fb56c..2ab7c89e2fed 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
> > @@ -3685,11 +3685,16 @@ void mana_remove(struct gdma_dev *gd, bool 
> > suspending)
> >     struct gdma_context *gc = gd->gdma_context;
> >     struct mana_context *ac = gd->driver_data;
> >     struct mana_port_context *apc;
> > -   struct device *dev = gc->dev;
> > +   struct device *dev;
> >     struct net_device *ndev;
> >     int err;
> >     int i;
> >
> > +   if (!gc || !ac)
> > +           return;
> > +
> > +   dev = gc->dev;
> > +
> >     disable_work_sync(&ac->link_change_work);
> >     cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ac->gf_stats_work);
Thankyou for the correction, Simon.
I'll make this change in the next version.

- Vennela

Reply via email to