On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 03:45:42PM +0100, Rodrigo Alencar via B4 Relay wrote:
> AD5683_REGMAP and AD5693_REGMAP behave the same way in the common code, > and that is because they target single channel devices from the same > sub-family. There is no reason to separate them and it will make things > simpler when refactoring the chip info table. Not sure about naming, but LGTM, especially line that removed the trailing entry without comma — kills two birds with one stone. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
