On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 05:44:16PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > OK, so it does look like it picks the kernel uapi/asm/ptrace.h. It > builds fine on Debian stable (no GCS anywhere) with including > asm/ptrace.h and removing struct user_gcs.
> But I think we should include asm/ptrace.h in libc-gcs.h and not the > gcs-util.h header (for NT_ARM_GCS it's fine to keep in gcs-util.h). It's not glibc specific so it seems reasonable to keep it in gcs-util.h, even though we don't currently have any nolibc stuff that uses ptrace. That said this isn't particularly strongly held opinion so I don't *really* mind either way.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
