On 23/04/2026 17:22, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> acpm_dvfs_init_get_rate_cmd(cmd, clk_id);
> - acpm_dvfs_set_xfer(&xfer, cmd, ARRAY_SIZE(cmd), acpm_chan_id, true);
> + acpm_set_xfer(&xfer, cmd, ARRAY_SIZE(cmd), acpm_chan_id, true);
>
> ret = acpm_do_xfer(handle, &xfer);
> if (ret)
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/samsung/exynos-acpm-pmic.c
> b/drivers/firmware/samsung/exynos-acpm-pmic.c
> index 0c50993cc9a8..f032f2c69685 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/samsung/exynos-acpm-pmic.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/samsung/exynos-acpm-pmic.c
> @@ -58,16 +58,6 @@ static inline u32 acpm_pmic_get_bulk(u32 data, unsigned
> int i)
> return (data >> (ACPM_PMIC_BULK_SHIFT * i)) & ACPM_PMIC_BULK_MASK;
> }
>
> -static void acpm_pmic_set_xfer(struct acpm_xfer *xfer, u32 *cmd, size_t
> cmdlen,
> - unsigned int acpm_chan_id)
> -{
> - xfer->txd = cmd;
> - xfer->rxd = cmd;
> - xfer->txcnt = cmdlen;
> - xfer->rxcnt = cmdlen;
> - xfer->acpm_chan_id = acpm_chan_id;
The code is not equivalent. RX bits were always cleared. This should be
explained in the commit msg which would also provide a proof that you
actually analyzed if it has any impact.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
