On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 10:18:31AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > But still, it's HAVE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS which we want to depend on, not a > newly-invented HAVE_MTD. And there are other places we really ought to > be depending on HAVE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS too.
That would be misleading though - !CPU_CP15_MMU does not mean we support unaligned accesses. It means that we may have no way to support fixing up unaligned accesses. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
