Thanks for the review. > I do not see the SWS effect you want to avoid in the first place. > > This test is an ad-hoc test about your change, but I still do not see > why recomputing tp->ratio every time the rcvmss is increased is an > issue on loopback interface.
For the packetdrill script, it is taking more time. To actually show the window dropping to 0, I have to write a long script with many packets and application reads. This is because TCP does not shrink the right edge of an already open window. Since the C-code fix in Patch 1 is tested and working fine, should I send v3 with just the code fix first? I can work on the packetdrill script and send it later in a separate patch. Or should I wait and send both together? Kindly suggest how I should proceed. Thanks, Ankit
