On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 12:05:18PM -0400, Gregory Price wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 05:02:39AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Same change as the previous patch but for alloc_swap_folio: > > pass vmf->address directly instead of ALIGN_DOWN(vmf->address, ...). > > > > Starting to seem like this should all just get squashed into once patch. > > ~Gregory
I mean I was told the patches are too big and too hard to review. It's just same, independent changes made in several places. Does it matter if they are squashed or not?
