On 5/12/2026 12:30 AM, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> Yeah let's go with that then I think :)


Thanks Lorenzo and Jann.

I agree that the patch as posted goes in the wrong direction by treating
source gaps as ranges that should be propagated to the destination.  Please
drop this patch.

If disallowing source gaps in this multi-VMA move path still sounds right,
I can look into a v2/new patch that rejects sparse source ranges up front
instead.

Thanks,
fujunjie


Reply via email to