Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> writes: >> (While I was there, I noticed that threat-model.rst has no SPDX line; >> what's your preference there?) > > I didn't notice any was needed, I tried to get inspiration from other > files for the format (I'm still not familiar with the rst format > though this time I could successfully install the tools).
In theory every file in the kernel tree is supposed to have one; many documentation files lag a bit behind on that front, but we try... > Same for > the label at the top BTW, I just did what I found somewhere else, > probably security-bugs.rst which is similar (no SPDX line and has a > label). So regarding SPDX, I do not have any preference. If one is > needed, let's pick what's used by default, I do not care, as long > as it allows the doc to be published. The top-of-file label got started somewhere and has been cargo-culted extensively since then; it has proved hard to eradicate. As for SPDX, the most common is the basic: .. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 Thanks, jon
