On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 12:38:01PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 5/11/26 19:54, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote:
> > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
> > 
> > While an srcu_struct structure is in the midst of switching from CPU-0
> > to all-CPUs state, it can attempt to invoke callbacks for CPUs that
> > have never been online.  Worse yet, it can attempt in invoke callbacks
> > for CPUs that never will be online, even including imaginary CPUs not in
> > cpu_possible_mask.  This can cause hangs on s390,
> 
> Uladzislau, Paul, according to the fixes tag below this change fixes a
> change that went into 7.0-rc6 -- and apparently causes a "hang" on some
> architectures. So shouldn't this be heading to mainline instead of
> -next? Ideally with a stable tag to ensure backporting to 7.0.y, but
> that is a separate decision?
> 
I assume it will be picked to stable since there is a "Fixes:" tag. From
the other hand i can explicitly update commit message with Cc: 
[email protected]

Paul, any thoughts?

--
Uladzislau Rezki

Reply via email to