On Fri, 2026-05-15 at 12:19 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> In anticipation of making x86_cpuinit.early_percpu_clock_init(), i.e.
> kvm_setup_secondary_clock(), a dedicated sched_clock hook that will be
> invoked if and only if kvmclock is set as sched_clock, ensure APs enable
> their kvmclock during CPU online.  While a redundant write to the MSR is
> technically ok, skip the registration when kvmclock is sched_clock so that
> it's somewhat obvious that kvmclock *needs* to be enabled during early
> bringup when it's being used as sched_clock.
> 
> Plumb in the BSP's resume path purely for documentation purposes.  Both
> KVM (as-a-guest) and timekeeping/clocksource hook syscore_ops, and it's
> not super obvious that using KVM's hooks would be flawed.  E.g. it would
> work today, because KVM's hooks happen to run after/before timekeeping's
> hooks during suspend/resume, but that's sheer dumb luck as the order in
> which syscore_ops are invoked depends entirely on when a subsystem is
> initialized and thus registers its hooks.
> 
> Opportunsitically make the registration messages more precise to help
> debug issues where kvmclock is enabled too late.

That's a hard word to type, isn't it?

> Opportunstically WARN in kvmclock_{suspend,resume}() to harden against
> future bugs.

So is that :)

> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to