On Sat, May 30 2026 at 13:08, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> On 29/05/2026 22:00, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>   static inline void pps_get_ts(struct pps_event_time *ts)
>>   {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_NTP_PPS
>>      struct system_time_snapshot snap;
>>   
>> -    ktime_get_snapshot(&snap);
>> -    ts->ts_real = ktime_to_timespec64(snap.real);
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_NTP_PPS
>> -    ts->ts_raw = ktime_to_timespec64(snap.raw);
>> +    ktime_get_snapshot_id(CLOCK_REALTIME, &snap);
>> +    ts->ts_real = ktime_to_timespec64(snap.systime);
>> +    ts->ts_raw = ktime_to_timespec64(snap.monoraw);
>> +#else
>> +    ktime_get_real_ts64(&ts->ts_real);
>
>       /*
>        * Prevent kernel stack information disclosure if the
>        * structure is later copied to userspace.
>        */
>       ts->ts_raw = (struct timespec64){0, 0};

Which will fail to build because of:

struct pps_event_time {
#ifdef CONFIG_NTP_PPS
        struct timespec64 ts_raw;
#endif /* CONFIG_NTP_PPS */
        struct timespec64 ts_real;
};

No?

Reply via email to