Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 16:26:43 -0800 > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Guys, how often mut it be said? PLEASE always test all code with all >> kernel deubg options enabled. > > maybe we should make a CONFIG_KERNEL_DEVELOPER option that SELECTs the > various options that really should be on. > > If there is a chance of reasonable agreement on what those options are I'll > cook > up a patch...
There are a few in Documentation/SubmitChecklist items 12 and 15. > (but I don't want to get bogged down in a 500 mail flamewar about > CONFIG_FOO_BAR being right for this or not...) You can be rather sure that there will be at least... questions and concerns... ;-) Anyway, the root problem is that developers and integrators don't take time to follow the rules in SubmitChecklist. (I know that I still have ways to go to improve my own processes in that regard.) A Kconfig switch may raise awareness of SubmitChecklist a little bit, but I'm afraid it is not awareness what's the issue here. -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--- --=- -=-=- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
