On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 03:48:02PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 03:48:22PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 01:34:34PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 10:14:18AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
... > > > > + x86_64 and arm64 defconfig builds with CONFIG_FOO_BAR=y using GCC > > > > + 11.2 show no new warnings, and LeakMagic no longer warns about this > > > > + code path. As we don't have a FooBar device to test with, no runtime > > > > + testing was able to be performed. > > > > > > People have started sending commit messages in this exact template and > > > normally I would ask them resend with the meta commentary from this > > > paragraph below the --- cut off line. > > > > > > Do we really want this "Compile tested only" stuff in the permanent git > > > log? > > > > +1 here, can we rather avoid flooding commit messages with the meta, that > > anyways is available in lore.kernel.org archives? > > Hm, I have gotten a lot of push-back from maintainers (reasonablly) > wanting to know the specific level of testing patches get. In the case > of lacking hardware, this seems like useful information still. I am *not* against providing this information (actually I on the same page), I'm just against putting it into the commit message! We have a comment block put it there, please. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
