On Sunday 10 February 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote: [...]
> > > +__setup("kgdboc=", kgdboc_option_setup); > > > > no need for obsolete __setup, we have module_param_call() below > > it's needed for bzImage kernels. I just tested it and without __setup() > no init sequence is run and KGDB is not activated. weird, should work with "kgdboc.kgdboc=" parameter [...] > > > +#ifndef KGDB_MAX_BREAKPOINTS > > > +# define KGDB_MAX_BREAKPOINTS 1000 > > > +#endif > > > + > > > +#define KGDB_HW_BREAKPOINT 1 > > > > unused > > hm, both KGDB_MAX_BREAKPOINTS and KGDB_HW_BREAKPOINT are used. my bad [...] > > if kgdb_isremovedbreak() helper is moved before kgdb_set_sw_break() > > and converted to return 'i' on success and '-1' on failure then it can > > be used instead the above for () loop > > dunno - that would complicate arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c's use of > kgdb_isremovedbreak() and looks a bit complex. If you feel strongly the whole difference w.r.t. arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c should be: - if (exception == 3 && kgdb_isremovedbreak(regs->ip - 1)) { + if (exception == 3 && kgdb_isremovedbreak(regs->ip - 1) >= 0) { > about it, could you send a patch? well, maybe in the future if nobody fixes it :) [ added as low-prio to my TODO... ] Thanks for fixing all the other stuff. Bart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/