On Tue, 2026-06-23 at 16:32 +0100, David Laight wrote: > > Both those seem to contain multiple expansions of is_constexpr(). > I'd be surprised if __builtin_constant_p() wasn't good enough. > > I also wonder what kind of mess the object code looks like.
You should definitely wonder less out loud and only comment when you have actual hard facts... > I'd also worry whether the saturating maths in any way performs the correct > check. > I suspect the (non-saturated) value gets used for a kmalloc(), > but that has much smaller valid (and sane) limits than can come out of the > above. That's, frankly, ridiculous. johannes
