On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:57:06 +0530
"Thomas, Sujith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: Thomas Sujith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Added sanity checks for interface functions in thermal with
> other modules such as fan, processor, video etc..
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Sujith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/thermal.c |   69
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------

The patch is fairly seriously wordwrapped.

>  1 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6.24-rc3/drivers/thermal/thermal.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.24-rc3.orig/drivers/thermal/thermal.c
> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc3/drivers/thermal/thermal.c
> @@ -301,13 +301,27 @@ int thermal_zone_bind_cooling_device(str
>  {
>       struct thermal_cooling_device_instance *dev;
>       struct thermal_cooling_device_instance *pos;
> +     struct thermal_zone_device *pos1;
> +     struct thermal_cooling_device *pos2;
>       int result;
>  
> +     if (!tz || !cdev)
> +             return -EINVAL;

Is this change actually needed?  It's sloppy for a caller to be passing
invalid arguments into a callee, and it's not good for the callee to just
hide that sloppiness.

> -             return NULL;
> +             return  ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);

the patch adds several spaces like this in places where we don't normally
put them.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to