> > I think as a global policy this has ran its course. > > I'm honestly not sure why you sent this patch in the first place if you're > simply going to ignore it (+ people's opinions) anyway :)
I sent an RFC patch for the minimal acceptable change in my opinion. It turns out that the majority of people on here seem to prefer the removal that I mentioned as an alternative in the commit message instead and it already happens in practice. > I'll still send a patch to link the apparently redundant AI doc to the > generated > tooling doc because for those who do pay attention it's silly that they're not > connected. This on the other hand seems a bit strange given the direction of this discussion.
