On Fri, Jul 03, 2026 at 08:43:27AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2026 at 03:55:52PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
> I will spin this "fix" separated (CCing stable), and send a v2 for this
> selftest with priming enabled.

Quick update on this plan. The v2 for this patch depends on checksum fix[0],
given it touches a similar code:

        @@ -687,6 +692,7 @@ static struct kmemleak_object *__alloc_object(gfp_t 
gfp)
                atomic_set(&object->use_count, 1);
                object->excess_ref = 0;
                object->count = 0; 
        +       object->unref_scans = 0;
                object->checksum = ~0;   <-- Adde by the fix [0]

I will wait the "Fix" to land first, before sending v2, avoiding merge
conflicts and being able to rely on sashiko to review it (instead of having 
merging
issues)

Link: 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
 [0]

Reply via email to