On Mon, 29 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This always struck me as the most stupid rule of thumb I'd ever heard > of. With this metric, systems which precisely need swap the most It used to be basically meaningful, for systems that had to swap, instead of page. In those cases, in order to be assured of getting any use out of the system, it had to be at least twice the amount of RAM needed. Of course, you could have twice as much swap as RAM, four times, eight times... but twice was the usual amount. It's pretty well useless now though, even on Solaris :} - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- 2.4.0-test12: SiS pirq handling.. Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test12: SiS pirq handling.. Sven Koch
- Recommended swap for 2.4.x. Alan Olsen
- Re: Recommended swap for 2.4.x. Linus Torvalds
- Re: Recommended swap for 2.4.x. alex
- Re: Recommended swap for 2.4.x. Mike Castle
- RE: Recommended swap for 2.4.x. William T Wilson
- RE: Recommended swap for 2.4.x. Kevin Krieser
- Re: Recommended swap for 2.4.x. Jeff Chua
- Re: Recommended swap for 2.4.x. James H. Cloos Jr.
- Re: Recommended swap for 2.4.x. idalton
- Re: Recommended swap for 2.4.x. Rik van Riel
- Re: Recommended swap for 2.4.x. alex
- Re: Recommended swap for 2.4.x. Rik van Riel
- Re: Recommended swap for 2.4.... Matthew Kirkwood
- Re: Recommended swap for ... Rik van Riel
- Re: Recommended swap for ... Russell King